Contact Us

Azure Security Assessment

Independent Technical Assurance

Know whether your Azure controls are genuinely working — not just configured

Azure environments grow in complexity quietly — and controls that were configured correctly at deployment do not always remain effective as infrastructure evolves.

As Azure environments grow in complexity and criticality, it is not enough for controls to be configured — they must operate as intended. We assess identity, access, network design, logging, threat protection and governance settings to determine whether your Azure controls are genuinely effective in practice.

Engagements are scoped to the architecture and complexity of your environment, with findings prioritised by real-world risk rather than theoretical severity.

Who this is typically for

This assessment is typically most valuable for organisations running workloads in Azure, typically technology companies, professional services firms and similar organisations that have:

  • moved operational infrastructure or data to the cloud
  • reasonable confidence in security controls, but no recent independent validation
  • need clear evidence to support internal assurance, prioritisation or decision-making

It is not a compliance audit. The focus is whether your Azure environment is genuinely secure in practice.

IDENTITY & ACCESS CONTROL

Privilege abuse is one of the most common paths to serious Azure compromise. We confirm whether your identity boundaries and role assignments are actually enforcing the limits you intend.

THREAT PROTECTION & DEFENDER CONFIGURATION

Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides coverage only when it is properly configured and scoped. We confirm whether your threat protection settings would generate actionable signals if your environment were targeted.

DATA PROTECTION & RESILIENCE

Data stored in Azure can be exposed, modified or lost through misconfiguration as easily as through attack. We assess whether your protection and recovery controls are reliable in practice.

GOVERNANCE & POLICY ENFORCEMENT

Azure environments drift without consistent governance. 

We evaluate whether your policies and management structures are enforcing standards consistently across all subscriptions and resources.

NETWORK ARCHITECTURE & EXPOSURE CONTROL

Unintended public exposure is one of the most common and consequential findings in Azure assessments. We evaluate segmentation, firewall configuration, public exposure and workload isolation to confirm that network controls effectively restrict unintended access paths.

MONITORING, LOGGING & INCIDENT READINESS

The value of every other control depends partly on whether a compromise would be detected. We assess whether your logging and alerting configuration would surface a meaningful signal if something went wrong.

How you will Gain

Benefits

Reduce Real-World Exposure

Identify control gaps and configuration weaknesses before they are exploited, reducing the likelihood and impact of compromise.

Clarity on Control Effectiveness

Understand whether identity, network and monitoring controls are functioning as intended — not simply deployed.

Improve Detection & Response Confidence

Validate logging, alerting and incident readiness to ensure meaningful security signals are generated and acted upon.

Strengthen Governance Enforcement

Confirm that Azure policies and organisational standards are consistently applied and reducing configuration drift.

Prioritised, Actionable Recommendations

Receive practical recommendations aligned to risk exposure — focused on what materially improves security posture.

Defensible Security Assurance

Gain evidence-based conclusions you can confidently present to leadership and stakeholders.

Start with a conversation

If you are responsible for Azure security in your organisation and want to know whether your controls are genuinely effective, a direct discussion with David is the most practical first step. No obligation, no sales process — just a clear conversation about your environment and whether an assessment would add value.
REQUEST AN AZURE SECURITY ASSESSMENT
HOW WE HAVE HELPED IN THE PAST

Case Studies

Supporting Material

Blog Posts on Azure & Assessments

STREAMLINED AND EFFICIENT

Engagement Approach

Azure Security Assessment engagements are structured to deliver clear outcomes, not open-ended consultancy.

Initial Scoping

Define scope, objectives and rules of engagement, ensuring testing reflects real-world threat exposure and business priorities.

Control Validation

Conduct structured assessment and impact validation across agreed in-scope systems.

Reporting & Technical Debrief

Document confirmed vulnerabilities, validated impact and prioritised remediation guidance with clear technical context.

Remediation & Re-Validation (Optional)

Where gaps are identified and support is required, practical guidance on remediation approach and validation of key fixes can be provided as an extension of the engagement.

COMPETITIVE AND BESPOKE

Engagement Scope & Depth

Azure environments vary significantly in scale, architecture and operational maturity. Meaningful security assessment cannot be reduced to fixed templates alone. Engagements are scoped based on subscription structure, identity complexity, network design, governance maturity and monitoring architecture. This ensures depth of analysis and defensible conclusions rather than surface-level review. For illustration, a representative mid-sized Azure estate may include:

  • A primary subscription with structured resource groups
  • 10–15 compute workloads (VMs / App Services)
  • Multiple storage services and data stores
  • circa 50 IAM principals and role assignments
  • Conditional Access integration
  • Network segmentation via NSGs, firewall rules or hybrid connectivity

Larger or multi-subscription estates are assessed accordingly.

Azure Control Validation

The most common starting point for organisations seeking independent validation of their Azure security posture. A focused, fixed-scope engagement covering the core security architecture of a primary subscription — delivering clear findings and prioritised recommendations within a defined timeframe.
3-5 days
  • Identity and privilege boundary validation
  • Network exposure and segmentation review
  • Storage and encryption configuration
  • Diagnostic logging and monitoring coverage
  • Defender and threat protection configuration
  • Resource structure and access governance

Extended Control & Governance Review

Expands control validation to include governance maturity, policy enforcement and operational alignment. Suitable for environments requiring broader strategic assurance of Azure security maturity.
8-12 days
  • In addition to technical control validation, this may include:
  • Azure Policy and management group enforcement review
  • Configuration consistency across subscriptions
  • Governance and change control maturity
  • Monitoring, alerting and escalation processes
  • Structured improvement roadmap aligned to risk exposure

Complex & Multi-Subscription Engagements

For larger estates, multi-subscription environments or highly regulated operations, scope is tailored to architectural complexity and operational requirements.
Varies
  • Cross-subscription control alignment
  • Advanced network architecture review
  • Targeted Azure penetration testing available as a combined engagement with penetration testing where required
  • Architectural deep-dives
  • Control framework alignment where required

Start with a conversation

If you are responsible for Azure security decisions and want an independent view of whether your controls are genuinely effective, a direct conversation with David is the most practical starting point. No obligation, no sales process — just a clear discussion about your environment and whether an assessment would add value.
CONTACT METIS SECURITY